Happy Thanksgiving, y’all 👋. I hope you’re finding a little space to rest, cook, and enjoy the day.

The focus of today’s deep dive is the mounting legal pressure on OpenAI after a new discovery ruling that forces greater transparency around its historical training data practices.

It is a moment that captures how quickly the legal landscape for AI is shifting and how past decisions are shaping current risk. Let’s get into it.

Driving the news: A federal judge ordered OpenAI to turn over detailed records about its training data after authors alleged the company used copyrighted books without permission. The ruling forces OpenAI to disclose documents tied to datasets the company previously deleted, shifting momentum toward the plaintiffs. The decision increases scrutiny around how generative AI companies sourced early corpora and how transparent they must be in ongoing litigation, with Winston Cho reporting for The Hollywood Reporter. Link

The stakes: The court’s ruling signals a tightening legal environment for training data transparency. For OpenAI, the decision introduces operational and reputational risk at a moment when enterprise trust and regulatory momentum matter more than ever. For publishers and authors, it represents validation that claims about unauthorized use will not be dismissed on technicalities or timing.

• If more courts follow this logic, the center of gravity in AI copyright disputes shifts toward deeper disclosure, raising the cost and complexity of model development for every major AI company.

The friction: AI companies have long argued that broad text ingestion is necessary for competitive model performance, positioning training data as both proprietary IP and a national interest priority. Authors and publishers argue that the same secrecy shields potential infringement and deprives creators of compensation or consent. The two positions create an unstable legal collision: product imperatives versus rights based transparency.

• OpenAI’s deletion of earlier datasets has already drawn skepticism about whether removals were procedural cleanup or strategic avoidance. The court’s willingness to force recovery of those records reinforces a judicial appetite for full historical accounting. It also highlights a structural tension in the generative AI ecosystem: companies want to move fast but legacy data choices still anchor them to early operational shortcuts.

• As scrutiny increases, the liability surface expands. Disclosure obligations could expose not just training materials but internal decision frameworks that reveal how risk was evaluated, deprioritized, or overlooked in early development cycles.

What this unlocks: More aggressive discovery standards will reshape how AI companies build next generation models. Expect expanded dataset provenance tracking, more robust licensing strategies, and tighter compliance pipelines. Investors will push for more structured risk controls. Publishers and rights holders will gain negotiating leverage to pursue collective licensing or statutory frameworks.

The bigger picture: The generative AI market is entering a regulatory normalization phase. What were once industry norms such as opaque datasets and retrospective cleanups are becoming legal vulnerabilities. The companies that adapt fastest to transparent and traceable data architectures will be better positioned for large scale commercial adoption.

For everything else, see below 👇:

Entertainment

1. Why Isn’t the ‘Thanksgiving Movie’ a Thing? — (Eric Vilas Boas and Alex Ross Perry for Vulture) — Link

2. Goldfish joins Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade with the tiniest float ever — (Grace Snelling for Fast Company) — Link

AI

4. MIT study finds AI is already capable of replacing 11.7% of U.S. workers — (Grace Snelling for Fast Company) — Link

5. More AI: Will YouTube's new promptable feed replace the recommendation algorithm — (James Hale for Tubefilter) — Link

6. AI shopping wars: Walmart, Amazon, Target, Google, Meta, OpenAI unveil new tools — (Kelly Tyko for Axios) — Link

7. Why can’t ChatGPT tell time — (Elissa Welle for The Verge) — Link

Commerce

8. During the Holidays Retailers Want Social Media Attention Too — (Rachel Felder for The New York Times) — Link

9. Marketers report news advertising outperforms campaign baselines by 60 percent — (Luis Rijo for PPC Land) — Link

Culture

10. What Is ‘Stack Dating’ and Why Is Gen Z Obsessed With It — (Sammi Caramela for Vice) — Link

Thanks for reading! Enjoyed this edition? Share it with a friend or colleague!

• Was this forwarded to you? Sign up here to receive future editions directly in your inbox.

• Support the Newsletter: If you’d like to support my work, consider contributing via Buy Me a Coffee.

• Stay Connected: For more insights and updates, visit my website or follow me on LinkedIn, YouTube, and TikTok.

• Work with Me: Interested in partnering with me on sponsored content, consulting/advising, or speaking and workshops? Get in touch here.